![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
review
Feb. 8th, 2008 | 04:57 pm
Taking a page from Elizabeth S Clarke's book, in the figurative sense, an excerpt of what I got out of a movie review: Non-punctilious Cloverfield.
(What remains is still emotive. Is coherancy, greater or lesser? How much of the content and writer identity successfully carried when "stripped of content"? Even now it still seems like a negative review; speaking of reviews.)
(What remains is still emotive. Is coherancy, greater or lesser? How much of the content and writer identity successfully carried when "stripped of content"? Even now it still seems like a negative review; speaking of reviews.)